Core i3-7100U vs Pentium G3260
Description
The i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 57.3 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 57.3 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2016
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
33.38k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.6k points
58.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7100U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
8.66k
11.73k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
12.31k
10.45k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
4.55k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
3.83k (x0.98)
TOTAL
28.16k
30.56k (x1.09)
Multithread
i3-7100U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
17.87k
22.99k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
28.59k
20.53k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.68k
8.82k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
6.55k (x2.08)
TOTAL
57.28k
58.89k (x1.03)
Performance/W
i3-7100U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
1191 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1906 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
512 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
210 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
3819 points/W
1111 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100U
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
3609 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5128 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1633 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
11735 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4