Core i3-7100U vs i5-2500
Description
The i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-2500 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 60.5 k points while the i5-2500 gets 86.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2500 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 60.5 k points while the i5-2500 gets 86.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2500 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
206a7
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2016
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
33.38k points
27.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.6k points
86.86k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7100U
i5-2500
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
9.92k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
13.49k
8.8k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
4.27k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
4.62k (x1.18)
TOTAL
29.36k
27.61k (x0.94)
Multithread
i3-7100U
i5-2500
Test#1 (Integers)
18.33k
35.79k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
31.08k
31.77k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
15.5k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.61k
3.8k (x1.05)
TOTAL
60.52k
86.86k (x1.44)
Performance/W
i3-7100U
i5-2500
Test#1 (Integers)
1222 points/W
377 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2072 points/W
334 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
500 points/W
163 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
240 points/W
40 points/W
TOTAL
4035 points/W
914 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100U
i5-2500
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
2682 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5622 points/GHz
2377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1153 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1624 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
12235 points/GHz
7461 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4