Core i3-7100U vs Celeron J3455
Description
The i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the J3455 is based on Goldmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 57.3 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.2 times faster than the J3455. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 57.3 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.2 times faster than the J3455. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
506c9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Apollo Lake
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
August 2016
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
33.38k points
12.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.6k points
47.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7100U
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
8.66k
6.02k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
12.31k
3.49k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
2.01k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
1.47k (x0.37)
TOTAL
28.16k
12.98k (x0.46)
Multithread
i3-7100U
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
17.87k
23.7k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
28.59k
13.75k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.68k
7.8k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
2.09k (x0.66)
TOTAL
57.28k
47.34k (x0.83)
Performance/W
i3-7100U
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
1191 points/W
2370 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1906 points/W
1375 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
512 points/W
780 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
210 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
3819 points/W
4734 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100U
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
3609 points/GHz
2619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5128 points/GHz
1517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1633 points/GHz
637 points/GHz
TOTAL
11735 points/GHz
5645 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4