Core i3-7100U vs Ryzen 7 4800H
Description
The i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 79.6 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 5.5 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 79.6 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 5.5 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
860f01
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
August 2016
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
33.38k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.6k points
436.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100U
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
16.59k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
13.45k
23.51k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
9.38k (x3.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
7.98k (x2.35)
TOTAL
33.38k
57.47k (x1.72)
Multithread
i3-7100U
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
34.95k
152.43k (x4.36)
Test#2 (FP)
33.53k
195.79k (x5.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
83.2k (x10.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.38k
5.38k (x1.59)
TOTAL
79.6k
436.8k (x5.49)
Performance/W
i3-7100U
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2330 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2235 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
5307 points/W
9707 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100U
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5606 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5606 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1415 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
13909 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4