Core i3-7100U vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 79.6 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.1 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 79.6 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 2.1 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
33.38k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.6k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-7100U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2.41k
3.89k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
9.77k
17.94k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.13k
5.34k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
6.62k (x1.86)
TOTAL
18.86k
33.79k (x1.79)
Multithread
i3-7100U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5k
15.07k (x3.02)
Test#2 (FP)
21.48k
66.84k (x3.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.39k
19.56k (x2.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
6.54k (x2.06)
TOTAL
37.05k
108.01k (x2.92)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7100U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
8.66k
14.3k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
12.31k
21.69k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
5.42k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
6.6k (x1.68)
TOTAL
28.16k
48k (x1.7)
Multithread
i3-7100U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.87k
55.45k (x3.1)
Test#2 (FP)
28.59k
83.13k (x2.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.68k
20.76k (x2.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
6.58k (x2.09)
TOTAL
57.28k
165.91k (x2.9)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7100U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
13.05k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
13.49k
22.88k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
5.39k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
7.31k (x1.88)
TOTAL
29.36k
48.63k (x1.66)
Multithread
i3-7100U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
18.33k
51.73k (x2.82)
Test#2 (FP)
31.08k
87.74k (x2.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
20.74k (x2.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.61k
6.57k (x1.82)
TOTAL
60.52k
166.79k (x2.76)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
14.48k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
13.45k
23.84k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
5.43k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
5.46k (x1.61)
TOTAL
33.38k
49.21k (x1.47)
Multithread
i3-7100U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
34.95k
54.39k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
33.53k
88.77k (x2.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
20.04k (x2.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.38k
5.48k (x1.62)
TOTAL
79.6k
168.69k (x2.12)
Performance/W
i3-7100U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2330 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2235 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
5307 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5606 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5606 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1415 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
13909 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4