Core i3-7100U vs FX 8350
Description
The i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 8350 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 60.5 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 60.5 k points while the 8350 gets 118.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 8350 is 2 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
600f20
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2016
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
33.38k points
28.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.6k points
118.14k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7100U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
9.85k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
13.49k
8.41k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
3.58k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
6.32k (x1.62)
TOTAL
29.36k
28.16k (x0.96)
Multithread
i3-7100U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
18.33k
44.93k (x2.45)
Test#2 (FP)
31.08k
45.21k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
22.81k (x3.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.61k
5.19k (x1.44)
TOTAL
60.52k
118.14k (x1.95)
Performance/W
i3-7100U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
1222 points/W
359 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2072 points/W
362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
500 points/W
182 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
240 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
4035 points/W
945 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100U
8350
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
2402 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5622 points/GHz
2050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1624 points/GHz
1541 points/GHz
TOTAL
12235 points/GHz
6867 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4