Core i3-7100U vs Athlon II X2 260
Description
The i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 260 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 57.3 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 2.1 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 57.3 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 2.1 times faster than the 260. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
100f63
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Regor
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
August 2016
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
33.38k points
17.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.6k points
27.54k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7100U
260
Test#1 (Integers)
8.66k
6.04k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
12.31k
6.2k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
3.11k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
1.7k (x0.43)
TOTAL
28.16k
17.05k (x0.61)
Multithread
i3-7100U
260
Test#1 (Integers)
17.87k
10.02k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
28.59k
10.18k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.68k
5.1k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
2.25k (x0.71)
TOTAL
57.28k
27.54k (x0.48)
Performance/W
i3-7100U
260
Test#1 (Integers)
1191 points/W
154 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1906 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
512 points/W
78 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
210 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
3819 points/W
424 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100U
260
Test#1 (Integers)
3609 points/GHz
1886 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5128 points/GHz
1939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1633 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
11735 points/GHz
5328 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4