| | | | | | |

Core i3-7100 vs m7-6Y75


Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 100.1 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.9 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
406e3
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Skylake-Y
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
51 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
58.55k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
126.47k points
53.58k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7100
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
14.41k
10.24k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
22.38k
15.33k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
2.97k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
5.32k (x1.07)
TOTAL
47.21k
33.86k (x0.72)

Multithread

i3-7100

m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
30.48k
16.78k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
52.08k
25.09k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.97k
6.14k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.56k
5.58k (x1.22)
TOTAL
100.1k
53.58k (x0.54)

Performance/W
i3-7100
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
598 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1021 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
89 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
1963 points/W
13395 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-7100
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
3695 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1273 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
12105 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4