Core i3-7100 vs i7-8565U
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-8565U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 126.5 k points while the i7-8565U gets 142.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8565U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 126.5 k points while the i7-8565U gets 142.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8565U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
806eb
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
51 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
58.55k points
67.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
126.47k points
142.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.77k
27.2k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
23.26k
23.47k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.91k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
12.25k (x2.99)
TOTAL
58.55k
67.83k (x1.16)
Multithread
i3-7100
i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.98k
64.33k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
54.73k
58.47k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.12k
15.82k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.65k
3.93k (x1.08)
TOTAL
126.47k
142.55k (x1.13)
Performance/W
i3-7100
i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
1078 points/W
4288 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1073 points/W
3898 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
257 points/W
1055 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
262 points/W
TOTAL
2480 points/W
9503 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
6607 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5964 points/GHz
5103 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1393 points/GHz
1067 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1049 points/GHz
2663 points/GHz
TOTAL
15014 points/GHz
14746 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4