| | | | | | |

Core i3-7100 vs i7-7700


Description
Both models i3-7100 and i7-7700 are based on Kaby Lake architecture.

The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 126.5 k points while the i7-7700 gets 257.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700 is 2 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
906e9
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
51 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
58.55k points
67.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
126.47k points
257.52k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-7100
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
4.01k
4.23k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
16.38k
16.76k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.31k
5.42k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
12.23k (x3.07)
TOTAL
29.69k
38.64k (x1.3)

Multithread

i3-7100

i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
8.1k
16.71k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
38.7k
73.1k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.69k
25.76k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.76k
7.12k (x1.89)
TOTAL
63.24k
122.68k (x1.94)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7100
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
14.04k
15.33k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
20.55k
21.94k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.41k
5.85k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
12.52k (x3.14)
TOTAL
43.99k
55.64k (x1.26)

Multithread

i3-7100

i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
30.09k
61.73k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
47.84k
99.91k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.13k
27.03k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
9.28k (x2.64)
TOTAL
94.59k
197.96k (x2.09)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7100
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
14.41k
15.34k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
22.38k
23.41k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
5.87k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
11.07k (x2.23)
TOTAL
47.21k
55.69k (x1.18)

Multithread

i3-7100

i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
30.48k
62.68k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
52.08k
105.24k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.97k
26.35k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.56k
5.79k (x1.27)
TOTAL
100.1k
200.07k (x2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
25.77k
26.7k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
23.26k
23.7k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.46k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
11.48k (x2.81)
TOTAL
58.55k
67.33k (x1.15)

Multithread

i3-7100

i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
54.98k
115.97k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
54.73k
108.43k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.12k
26.28k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.65k
6.85k (x1.88)
TOTAL
126.47k
257.52k (x2.04)

Performance/W
i3-7100
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
1078 points/W
1784 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1073 points/W
1668 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
257 points/W
404 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
2480 points/W
3962 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-7100
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
6607 points/GHz
6356 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5964 points/GHz
5643 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1393 points/GHz
1300 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1049 points/GHz
2733 points/GHz
TOTAL
15014 points/GHz
16032 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4