Core i3-7100 vs i5-6200U
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-6200U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 126.5 k points while the i5-6200U gets 81.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 126.5 k points while the i5-6200U gets 81.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-6200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
406e3
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
51 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
58.55k points
38.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
126.47k points
81.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.77k
17.06k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
23.26k
15.24k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
3.35k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
3.22k (x0.79)
TOTAL
58.55k
38.87k (x0.66)
Multithread
i3-7100
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.98k
35.68k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
54.73k
33.68k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.12k
7.74k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.65k
4.09k (x1.12)
TOTAL
126.47k
81.18k (x0.64)
Performance/W
i3-7100
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1078 points/W
2378 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1073 points/W
2245 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
257 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
272 points/W
TOTAL
2480 points/W
5412 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
i5-6200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6607 points/GHz
6091 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5964 points/GHz
5445 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1393 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1049 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
TOTAL
15014 points/GHz
13882 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4