| | | | | | |

Core i3-7100 vs i5-2320


Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-2320 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 100.1 k points while the i5-2320 gets 66.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-2320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
206a7
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
51 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
58.55k points
24.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
126.47k points
66.48k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7100
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
14.41k
8.88k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
22.38k
7.84k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
3.79k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
3.51k (x0.71)
TOTAL
47.21k
24.01k (x0.51)

Multithread

i3-7100

i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
30.48k
27.98k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
52.08k
24.48k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.97k
11.42k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.56k
2.6k (x0.57)
TOTAL
100.1k
66.48k (x0.66)

Performance/W
i3-7100
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
598 points/W
295 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1021 points/W
258 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
120 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
89 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
1963 points/W
700 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-7100
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
3695 points/GHz
2689 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
2375 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1273 points/GHz
1063 points/GHz
TOTAL
12105 points/GHz
7277 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4