Core i3-7100 vs M-5Y10c
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 100.1 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 2 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 100.1 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 2 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
306d4
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Broadwell-Y
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
51 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
October 2014
Mean monothread perf.
58.55k points
22.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
126.47k points
51k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7100
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
14.41k
7.22k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
22.38k
9.98k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
2.75k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
2.98k (x0.6)
TOTAL
47.21k
22.93k (x0.49)
Multithread
i3-7100
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
30.48k
15.07k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
52.08k
24.8k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.97k
6.68k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.56k
4.46k (x0.98)
TOTAL
100.1k
51k (x0.51)
Performance/W
i3-7100
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
598 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1021 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
89 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
1963 points/W
10200 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
3695 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5739 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1399 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1273 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
12105 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4