Core i3-7100 vs Ryzen 7 5800X
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5800X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 4.5 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 4.5 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
a20f10
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
51 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2017
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
89.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
558.42k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
24.14k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
26.3k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
12.09k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
26.54k (x6.68)
TOTAL
57.86k
89.07k (x1.54)
Multithread
i3-7100
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.73k
183.54k (x3.35)
Test#2 (FP)
53.55k
237.27k (x4.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.93k
107.95k (x8.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
29.66k (x8.25)
TOTAL
124.8k
558.42k (x4.47)
Performance/W
i3-7100
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1050 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
1028 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
2447 points/W
5318 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6547 points/GHz
5137 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5893 points/GHz
5596 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
2571 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1019 points/GHz
5646 points/GHz
TOTAL
14836 points/GHz
18951 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4