| | | | | | |

Core i3-7100 vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 2.3 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
800f82
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
51 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
291.53k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-7100
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.01k
3.41k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
16.38k
15.96k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.31k
4.69k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
17.42k (x4.37)
TOTAL
29.69k
41.47k (x1.4)

Multithread

i3-7100

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
8.1k
20.88k (x2.58)
Test#2 (FP)
38.7k
110.37k (x2.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.69k
39.25k (x3.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.76k
6.66k (x1.77)
TOTAL
63.24k
177.16k (x2.8)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
13.76k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
23.03k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
5.12k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
15.23k (x3.83)
TOTAL
57.86k
57.13k (x0.99)

Multithread

i3-7100

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
54.73k
83.23k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
53.55k
161.06k (x3.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.93k
40.52k (x3.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
6.73k (x1.87)
TOTAL
124.8k
291.53k (x2.34)

Performance/W
i3-7100
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1050 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
2447 points/W
4485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-7100
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6547 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5893 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1019 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
14836 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4