Core i3-7100 vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 126.5 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.6 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 126.5 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.6 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f10
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
51 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
58.55k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
126.47k points
198.27k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-7100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.01k
3.8k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
16.38k
17.38k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.31k
5.17k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
3.16k (x0.79)
TOTAL
29.69k
29.52k (x0.99)
Multithread
i3-7100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
8.1k
15.28k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
38.7k
76.44k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.69k
27.48k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.76k
3.02k (x0.8)
TOTAL
63.24k
122.2k (x1.93)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.04k
13.95k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
20.55k
20.7k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.41k
5.33k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
3.03k (x0.76)
TOTAL
43.99k
43.01k (x0.98)
Multithread
i3-7100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
30.09k
58.56k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
47.84k
92.95k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.13k
28.55k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
2.98k (x0.85)
TOTAL
94.59k
183.04k (x1.94)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.41k
13.04k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
22.38k
22.35k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
5.37k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
3.4k (x0.68)
TOTAL
47.21k
44.15k (x0.94)
Multithread
i3-7100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
30.48k
56.49k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
52.08k
100.74k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.97k
28.21k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.56k
3.04k (x0.67)
TOTAL
100.1k
188.49k (x1.88)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.77k
14.2k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
23.26k
23.23k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
5.35k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
5.18k (x1.27)
TOTAL
58.55k
47.96k (x0.82)
Multithread
i3-7100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
54.98k
58.24k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
54.73k
105.72k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.12k
28.73k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.65k
5.59k (x1.53)
TOTAL
126.47k
198.27k (x1.57)
Performance/W
i3-7100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1078 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1073 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
257 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
2480 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6607 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5964 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1393 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1049 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
15014 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4