Core i3-7100 vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 2 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 2 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
51 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
11.13k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
19.38k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
4.47k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
3.87k (x0.97)
TOTAL
57.86k
38.85k (x0.67)
Multithread
i3-7100
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.73k
17.13k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
53.55k
30.56k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.93k
9.44k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
4.09k (x1.14)
TOTAL
124.8k
61.23k (x0.49)
Performance/W
i3-7100
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1050 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
2447 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6547 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5893 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1019 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
14836 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4