Core i3-7100 vs Ryzen 3 1200
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 1200 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 126.5 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.1 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 126.5 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.1 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
800f11
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
51 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
58.55k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
126.47k points
117.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
25.77k
11.73k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
23.26k
18.85k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.22k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
2.76k (x0.67)
TOTAL
58.55k
37.55k (x0.64)
Multithread
i3-7100
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
54.98k
38.56k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
54.73k
62.21k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.12k
13.7k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.65k
3.33k (x0.91)
TOTAL
126.47k
117.81k (x0.93)
Performance/W
i3-7100
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
1078 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1073 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
257 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
2480 points/W
1812 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
6607 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5964 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1393 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1049 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
15014 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4