Core i3-7100 vs Athlon 3000G
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 126.5 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.3 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 126.5 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.3 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
51 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
58.55k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
126.47k points
95.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.77k
13.02k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
23.26k
20.56k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.81k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
5.43k (x1.33)
TOTAL
58.55k
43.82k (x0.75)
Multithread
i3-7100
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
54.98k
27.29k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
54.73k
49.37k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.12k
13.57k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.65k
5.61k (x1.54)
TOTAL
126.47k
95.84k (x0.76)
Performance/W
i3-7100
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
1078 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1073 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
257 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
72 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
2480 points/W
2738 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
6607 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5964 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1393 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1049 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
15014 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4