Core i3-7100 vs i3-1115G4
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1115G4 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
806c1
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
51 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
137.96k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-7100
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.01k
3.75k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
16.38k
17.22k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.31k
9.79k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
8.21k (x2.06)
TOTAL
29.69k
38.97k (x1.31)
Multithread
i3-7100
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.1k
9.19k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
38.7k
35.47k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.69k
19.14k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.76k
5.82k (x1.55)
TOTAL
63.24k
69.62k (x1.1)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7100
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.04k
12.9k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.55k
21.4k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.41k
10.73k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
8.16k (x2.04)
TOTAL
43.99k
53.19k (x1.21)
Multithread
i3-7100
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
30.09k
30.31k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
47.84k
45.13k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.13k
20.17k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
5.77k (x1.64)
TOTAL
94.59k
101.38k (x1.07)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7100
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.41k
14.65k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
22.38k
21.57k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
9.93k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
8.02k (x1.62)
TOTAL
47.21k
54.18k (x1.15)
Multithread
i3-7100
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
30.48k
32.14k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
52.08k
43.54k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.97k
19.58k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.56k
5.61k (x1.23)
TOTAL
100.1k
100.87k (x1.01)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
24.25k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
21.63k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
9.09k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
7.23k (x1.82)
TOTAL
57.86k
62.19k (x1.07)
Multithread
i3-7100
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
54.73k
56.9k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
53.55k
55.68k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.93k
19.29k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
6.09k (x1.69)
TOTAL
124.8k
137.96k (x1.11)
Performance/W
i3-7100
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1050 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
2447 points/W
4927 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6547 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5893 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1019 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
14836 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4