Core i7-7020U vs Xeon E5-2660 v2
Description
The i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 60.1 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 7.6 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 60.1 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 7.6 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
306e4
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
10 /20
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
25600 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
33.63k points
19.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.15k points
459.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7020U
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
8.17k
7.26k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
12.42k
6.9k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
2.77k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.68k
2.55k (x0.55)
TOTAL
28.13k
19.48k (x0.69)
Multithread
i7-7020U
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
17.65k
180.2k (x10.21)
Test#2 (FP)
30.44k
191.43k (x6.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.19k
80.22k (x11.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.79k
7.46k (x1.56)
TOTAL
60.07k
459.31k (x7.65)
Performance/W
i7-7020U
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1177 points/W
1897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2029 points/W
2015 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
479 points/W
844 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
320 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
4005 points/W
4835 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7020U
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3550 points/GHz
2420 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5399 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1247 points/GHz
923 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2035 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
12231 points/GHz
6495 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4