| | | | | | |

Core i7-7020U vs i7-10750H


Description
The i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 73.1 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 4.8 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
a0652
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
33.63k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.15k points
349.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7020U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
4.69k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
8.36k
18.71k (x2.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
5.84k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.64k
13.95k (x3.01)
TOTAL
18.04k
43.19k (x2.39)

Multithread

i7-7020U

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.74k
18.79k (x3.96)
Test#2 (FP)
17.96k
86.1k (x4.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.95k
27.42k (x3.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.95k
5.27k (x1.06)
TOTAL
34.61k
137.58k (x3.98)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7020U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
8.18k
16.63k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
11.67k
24.17k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
6.38k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.68k
13.69k (x2.93)
TOTAL
27.5k
60.87k (x2.21)

Multithread

i7-7020U

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.51k
67.07k (x3.83)
Test#2 (FP)
27.61k
107.95k (x3.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.39k
27.05k (x3.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.78k
5.07k (x1.06)
TOTAL
57.3k
207.14k (x3.62)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7020U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
8.17k
16.71k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
12.42k
25.45k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
6.06k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.68k
13.2k (x2.82)
TOTAL
28.13k
61.43k (x2.18)

Multithread

i7-7020U

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.65k
67.59k (x3.83)
Test#2 (FP)
30.44k
111.94k (x3.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.19k
27.7k (x3.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.79k
5.3k (x1.11)
TOTAL
60.07k
212.53k (x3.54)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7020U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
29.06k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
12.72k
26.49k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
6.23k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
13.89k (x3.6)
TOTAL
33.63k
75.67k (x2.25)

Multithread

i7-7020U

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
31.11k
154.61k (x4.97)
Test#2 (FP)
31.15k
151.34k (x4.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.9k
36.33k (x5.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
6.93k (x1.74)
TOTAL
73.15k
349.21k (x4.77)

Performance/W
i7-7020U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2074 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2076 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
460 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
4877 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7020U
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6196 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5528 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1679 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
14624 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4