Core i7-7020U vs i3-8145U
Description
The i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-8145U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 73.1 k points while the i3-8145U gets 75.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8145U is 1 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 73.1 k points while the i3-8145U gets 75.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8145U is 1 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
806eb
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
33.63k points
34.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.15k points
75.13k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7020U
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
17.78k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
12.72k
12.8k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
2.61k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
1.3k (x0.34)
TOTAL
33.63k
34.48k (x1.03)
Multithread
i7-7020U
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
31.11k
28.06k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
31.15k
34.83k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.9k
9.69k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
2.55k (x0.64)
TOTAL
73.15k
75.13k (x1.03)
Performance/W
i7-7020U
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
2074 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2076 points/W
2322 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
460 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/W
170 points/W
TOTAL
4877 points/W
5008 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7020U
i3-8145U
Test#1 (Integers)
6196 points/GHz
4558 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5528 points/GHz
3281 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
669 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1679 points/GHz
332 points/GHz
TOTAL
14624 points/GHz
8840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4