| | | | | | |

Core i7-7020U vs Celeron G1610T


Description
The i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 57.3 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7020U is 1.5 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
306a9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
April 2018
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
33.63k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.15k points
38.59k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7020U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
2.34k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
8.36k
6.54k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
3k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.64k
2.74k (x0.59)
TOTAL
18.04k
14.62k (x0.81)

Multithread

i7-7020U

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.74k
4.67k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
17.96k
12.66k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.95k
5.95k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.95k
2.53k (x0.51)
TOTAL
34.61k
25.8k (x0.75)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7020U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.18k
7.87k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
11.67k
7.14k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
3.04k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.68k
2.79k (x0.6)
TOTAL
27.5k
20.84k (x0.76)

Multithread

i7-7020U

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
17.51k
15.12k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
27.61k
14.05k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.39k
5.94k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.78k
3.48k (x0.73)
TOTAL
57.3k
38.59k (x0.67)

Performance/W
i7-7020U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
1168 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1841 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
493 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
3820 points/W
1103 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7020U
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3555 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5073 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1293 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2034 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
11956 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4