Core i7-7020U vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 73.1 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 2.7 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 73.1 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 2.7 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
33.63k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.15k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7020U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
14.58k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
12.72k
23.98k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
5.35k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
6.34k (x1.64)
TOTAL
33.63k
50.25k (x1.49)
Multithread
i7-7020U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
31.11k
57.37k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
31.15k
107.03k (x3.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.9k
28.9k (x4.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
7.05k (x1.77)
TOTAL
73.15k
200.34k (x2.74)
Performance/W
i7-7020U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2074 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2076 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
460 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
4877 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7020U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6196 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5528 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1679 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
14624 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4