| | | | | | |

Core i7-7020U vs Ryzen 5 1600X


Description
The i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 73.1 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600X is 2.4 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
800f11
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
33.63k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.15k points
173.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7020U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2.3k
3.95k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
8.36k
18.36k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
5.39k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.64k
17.35k (x3.74)
TOTAL
18.04k
45.06k (x2.5)

Multithread

i7-7020U

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.74k
19.47k (x4.1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.96k
77.19k (x4.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.95k
15.4k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.95k
12.25k (x2.47)
TOTAL
34.61k
124.3k (x3.59)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7020U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
14.63k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
12.72k
24.09k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
5.51k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
15.86k (x4.11)
TOTAL
33.63k
60.09k (x1.79)

Multithread

i7-7020U

1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
31.11k
48.75k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
31.15k
80.1k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.9k
24.5k (x3.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
19.85k (x4.98)
TOTAL
73.15k
173.2k (x2.37)

Performance/W
i7-7020U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2074 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2076 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
460 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
4877 points/W
1823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7020U
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6196 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5528 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1679 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
14624 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4