Core i7-7020U vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 73.1 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 73.1 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3250U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Dali
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
33.63k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.15k points
77.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7020U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
9.33k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
12.72k
17.1k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
3.57k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
3.26k (x0.84)
TOTAL
33.63k
33.26k (x0.99)
Multithread
i7-7020U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
31.11k
22.14k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
31.15k
40.04k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.9k
10.71k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
5k (x1.25)
TOTAL
73.15k
77.88k (x1.06)
Performance/W
i7-7020U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
2074 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2076 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
460 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
4877 points/W
5192 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7020U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
6196 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5528 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1679 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
14624 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4