| | | | | | |

Core i7-7020U vs i5-11300H


Description
The i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7020U gets a score of 73.1 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-11300H is 3.9 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
806c1
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Tiger Lake H35
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
33.63k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
73.15k points
285.75k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7020U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
25.83k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
12.72k
23.56k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
9.2k (x3.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
5.06k (x1.31)
TOTAL
33.63k
63.64k (x1.89)

Multithread

i7-7020U

i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
31.11k
116.87k (x3.76)
Test#2 (FP)
31.15k
121.08k (x3.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.9k
41.8k (x6.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
6k (x1.51)
TOTAL
73.15k
285.75k (x3.91)

Performance/W
i7-7020U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2074 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2076 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
460 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
4877 points/W
8164 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7020U
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6196 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5528 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1679 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
14624 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4