| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100U vs Pentium E5500


Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the E5500 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 39.2 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100U is 1.9 times faster than the E5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
1067a
Core
Skylake-U
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2015
April 2010
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
12.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
20.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100U
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.27k
2.56k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
9.18k
6.54k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
2.76k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
0.91k (x0.24)
TOTAL
18.21k
12.77k (x0.7)

Multithread

i3-6100U

E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.79k
4.32k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
23.04k
10.8k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.55k
4.7k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
0.87k (x0.23)
TOTAL
39.24k
20.69k (x0.53)

Performance/W
i3-6100U
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
319 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1536 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
503 points/W
72 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
257 points/W
13 points/W
TOTAL
2616 points/W
318 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
987 points/GHz
914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3989 points/GHz
2335 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1293 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1646 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
7916 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4