| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100U vs Xeon E5-2697 v2


Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 56.7 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 11.2 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
306e4
Core
Skylake-U
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
12 /24
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2015
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
633.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2.27k
3.44k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
9.18k
9.54k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
4.21k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
3.94k (x1.04)
TOTAL
18.21k
21.13k (x1.16)

Multithread

i3-6100U

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4.79k
73.17k (x15.29)
Test#2 (FP)
23.04k
230.83k (x10.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.55k
107.14k (x14.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
7.99k (x2.07)
TOTAL
39.24k
419.12k (x10.68)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6100U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
7.99k
10.64k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
9.53k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
4.12k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
3.62k (x0.96)
TOTAL
26.52k
27.91k (x1.05)

Multithread

i3-6100U

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.44k
252.69k (x16.37)
Test#2 (FP)
23.79k
238.68k (x10.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.93k
115.5k (x16.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.03k
10.98k (x2.72)
TOTAL
50.19k
617.84k (x12.31)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
8.06k
10.53k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
12.85k
9.98k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.14k
4k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
3.4k (x0.85)
TOTAL
28.06k
27.92k (x0.99)

Multithread

i3-6100U

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
247.05k (x14.9)
Test#2 (FP)
28.88k
264.43k (x9.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.38k
111.01k (x15.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.82k
10.66k (x2.79)
TOTAL
56.66k
633.14k (x11.17)

Performance/W
i3-6100U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1925 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
492 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
254 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
3777 points/W
4870 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3506 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5587 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1742 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
12201 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4