Core i3-6100U vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 56.7 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.3 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 56.7 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 3.3 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
206d7
Core
Skylake-U
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
8 /16
TDP
15 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2015
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
8.06k
8.76k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
12.85k
7.35k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.14k
3.86k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
3.32k (x0.83)
TOTAL
28.06k
23.28k (x0.83)
Multithread
i3-6100U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
78.51k (x4.73)
Test#2 (FP)
28.88k
66.46k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.38k
36.42k (x4.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.82k
3.88k (x1.02)
TOTAL
56.66k
185.26k (x3.27)
Performance/W
i3-6100U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1925 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
492 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
254 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
3777 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3506 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5587 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1742 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
12201 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4