| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100U vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 69.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 3.4 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
406f1
Core
Skylake-U
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2015
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
237.83k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.27k
2.6k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
9.18k
7.55k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
2.61k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
2.03k (x0.54)
TOTAL
18.21k
14.79k (x0.81)

Multithread

i3-6100U

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.79k
17.41k (x3.64)
Test#2 (FP)
23.04k
75.46k (x3.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.55k
26.25k (x3.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
4.65k (x1.21)
TOTAL
39.24k
123.78k (x3.15)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-6100U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.99k
8.22k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
11.82k
12.06k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
4.01k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
2.89k (x0.77)
TOTAL
26.52k
27.18k (x1.02)

Multithread

i3-6100U

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.44k
61.34k (x3.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.79k
90.21k (x3.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.93k
26.2k (x3.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.03k
4.62k (x1.15)
TOTAL
50.19k
182.37k (x3.63)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.06k
6.04k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
12.85k
10.18k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.14k
2.74k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
2.41k (x0.6)
TOTAL
28.06k
21.37k (x0.76)

Multithread

i3-6100U

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
47.51k (x2.87)
Test#2 (FP)
28.88k
75.12k (x2.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.38k
19.72k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.82k
5.45k (x1.43)
TOTAL
56.66k
147.8k (x2.61)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
12.16k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
12.19k
11.82k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
3.02k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
2.4k (x0.75)
TOTAL
30.73k
29.39k (x0.96)

Multithread

i3-6100U

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
29.33k
103.77k (x3.54)
Test#2 (FP)
28.81k
102.28k (x3.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.46k
26.13k (x4.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.33k
5.65k (x1.06)
TOTAL
69.94k
237.83k (x3.4)

Performance/W
i3-6100U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1956 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
431 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
4663 points/W
2798 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5459 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5302 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1382 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
13362 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4