Core i3-6100U vs i7-10700
Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 69.9 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 7.7 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 69.9 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 7.7 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
a0655
Core
Skylake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
16386 kB
Date
September 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
74.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
537.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100U
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
30.66k (x2.44)
Test#2 (FP)
12.19k
25.64k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
5.98k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
12.25k (x3.86)
TOTAL
30.73k
74.53k (x2.43)
Multithread
i3-6100U
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
29.33k
240.28k (x8.19)
Test#2 (FP)
28.81k
234.3k (x8.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.46k
56.12k (x8.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.33k
7.02k (x1.32)
TOTAL
69.94k
537.73k (x7.69)
Performance/W
i3-6100U
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
1956 points/W
3697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
3605 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
431 points/W
863 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
4663 points/W
8273 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
5459 points/GHz
6388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5302 points/GHz
5341 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1382 points/GHz
2553 points/GHz
TOTAL
13362 points/GHz
15527 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4