Core i3-6100U vs i5-3340M
Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 56.7 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3340M is 1.1 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 56.7 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3340M is 1.1 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-U
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2015
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
31.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
62.75k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
8.06k
11.51k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
12.85k
11.13k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.14k
4.4k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
4.55k (x1.13)
TOTAL
28.06k
31.58k (x1.13)
Multithread
i3-6100U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
22.59k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
28.88k
25.49k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.38k
10.42k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.82k
4.25k (x1.11)
TOTAL
56.66k
62.75k (x1.11)
Performance/W
i3-6100U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1925 points/W
728 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
492 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
254 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
3777 points/W
1793 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
3506 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5587 points/GHz
3273 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366 points/GHz
1295 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1742 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
TOTAL
12201 points/GHz
9288 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4