| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100U vs i5-3330


Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-3330 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 56.7 k points while the i5-3330 gets 104.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3330 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-U
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2015
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
29.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
104.78k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100U
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
8.06k
10.85k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
12.85k
10.47k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.14k
4.21k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
4.31k (x1.08)
TOTAL
28.06k
29.84k (x1.06)

Multithread

i3-6100U

i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
41.77k (x2.52)
Test#2 (FP)
28.88k
40.2k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.38k
16.11k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.82k
6.7k (x1.76)
TOTAL
56.66k
104.78k (x1.85)

Performance/W
i3-6100U
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
542 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1925 points/W
522 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
492 points/W
209 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
254 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
3777 points/W
1361 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
i5-3330
Test#1 (Integers)
3506 points/GHz
3390 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5587 points/GHz
3272 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1742 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
TOTAL
12201 points/GHz
9325 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4