| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100U vs i5-2430M


Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-2430M is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 56.7 k points while the i5-2430M gets 40.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-2430M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
206a7
Core
Skylake-U
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
Socket G2 (988B) / rPGA988B
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2015
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
22.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
40.76k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100U
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
8.06k
8.04k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
12.85k
7.37k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.14k
3.53k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
3.27k (x0.82)
TOTAL
28.06k
22.21k (x0.79)

Multithread

i3-6100U

i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
16.58k
15.74k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
28.88k
14.05k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.38k
7.16k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.82k
3.81k (x1)
TOTAL
56.66k
40.76k (x0.72)

Performance/W
i3-6100U
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
1105 points/W
450 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1925 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
492 points/W
205 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
254 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
3777 points/W
1165 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
3506 points/GHz
2680 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5587 points/GHz
2458 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1742 points/GHz
1091 points/GHz
TOTAL
12201 points/GHz
7404 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4