Core i3-6100U vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 69.9 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 5.2 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 69.9 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 5.2 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
860f01
Core
Skylake-U
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
September 2015
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100U
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
14.87k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
12.19k
21.53k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
8.39k (x2.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
8.21k (x2.58)
TOTAL
30.73k
53k (x1.72)
Multithread
i3-6100U
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
29.33k
124.63k (x4.25)
Test#2 (FP)
28.81k
158.62k (x5.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.46k
69.79k (x10.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.33k
7.53k (x1.41)
TOTAL
69.94k
360.57k (x5.16)
Performance/W
i3-6100U
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1956 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
431 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
4663 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5459 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5302 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1382 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
13362 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4