| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100U vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 69.9 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 4.2 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406e3
800f82
Core
Skylake-U
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2015
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
292.31k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
2.27k
3.41k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
9.18k
15.96k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.97k
4.69k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.79k
17.42k (x4.6)
TOTAL
18.21k
41.47k (x2.28)

Multithread

i3-6100U

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.79k
20.88k (x4.36)
Test#2 (FP)
23.04k
110.37k (x4.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.55k
39.25k (x5.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.86k
6.66k (x1.73)
TOTAL
39.24k
177.16k (x4.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
13.83k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
12.19k
23.16k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
5.15k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
15.18k (x4.78)
TOTAL
30.73k
57.33k (x1.87)

Multithread

i3-6100U

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
29.33k
83.44k (x2.84)
Test#2 (FP)
28.81k
161.53k (x5.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.46k
40.62k (x6.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.33k
6.72k (x1.26)
TOTAL
69.94k
292.31k (x4.18)

Performance/W
i3-6100U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
1956 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
431 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
4663 points/W
4497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
5459 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5302 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1382 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
13362 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4