Core i3-6100U vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i3-6100U is based on Skylake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 69.9 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 3.9 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100U gets a score of 69.9 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 3.9 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406e3
800f11
Core
Skylake-U
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2015
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
30.73k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.94k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
13.67k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
12.19k
22.28k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.81k
4.99k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
15.22k (x4.79)
TOTAL
30.73k
56.16k (x1.83)
Multithread
i3-6100U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
29.33k
81.03k (x2.76)
Test#2 (FP)
28.81k
145.84k (x5.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.46k
39.14k (x6.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.33k
6.79k (x1.27)
TOTAL
69.94k
272.8k (x3.9)
Performance/W
i3-6100U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
1956 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
431 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
356 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
4663 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100U
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
5459 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5302 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1382 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
13362 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4