Core i3-6100T vs Xeon X3430
Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the X3430 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the X3430 gets 35.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.4 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the X3430 gets 35.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.4 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
106e5
Core
Skylake-S
Lynnfield
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA1156
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2015
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
15.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
55.66k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100T
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
3.14k
1.75k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
12.26k
3.95k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
2.29k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
2.66k (x1.2)
TOTAL
21.55k
10.65k (x0.49)
Multithread
i3-6100T
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
6.52k
6.81k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
30.61k
15.37k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.59k
8.9k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.77k
4.42k (x1.59)
TOTAL
50.49k
35.49k (x0.7)
Performance/W
i3-6100T
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
186 points/W
72 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
875 points/W
162 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
302 points/W
94 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
47 points/W
TOTAL
1442 points/W
374 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
980 points/GHz
623 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3832 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
820 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
690 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
TOTAL
6733 points/GHz
3802 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4