Core i3-6100T vs Xeon E5645
Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the E5645 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the E5645 gets 50.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5645 is 1 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the E5645 gets 50.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5645 is 1 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
206c2
Core
Skylake-S
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
6 /6
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
November 2015
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
15.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
76.96k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100T
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
3.14k
1.78k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
12.26k
3.91k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
2.52k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
2.42k (x1.1)
TOTAL
21.55k
10.64k (x0.49)
Multithread
i3-6100T
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
6.52k
9.67k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
30.61k
22.92k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.59k
14.31k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.77k
3.81k (x1.37)
TOTAL
50.49k
50.7k (x1)
Performance/W
i3-6100T
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
186 points/W
121 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
875 points/W
286 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
302 points/W
179 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
1442 points/W
634 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
980 points/GHz
635 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3832 points/GHz
1397 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
901 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
690 points/GHz
865 points/GHz
TOTAL
6733 points/GHz
3798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4