Core i3-6100T vs Xeon E5-2680 v2
Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 79.1 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 7 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 79.1 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 7 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
306e4
Core
Skylake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
10 /20
TDP
35 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
25600 kB
Date
November 2015
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
551.1k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100T
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
10.46k
10.55k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
17.55k
10.02k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
3.99k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
3.66k (x1.19)
TOTAL
34.79k
28.23k (x0.81)
Multithread
i3-6100T
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
23.92k
215.04k (x8.99)
Test#2 (FP)
42.11k
230.43k (x5.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
96.87k (x9.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
8.76k (x3.41)
TOTAL
79.1k
551.1k (x6.97)
Performance/W
i3-6100T
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
683 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
300 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
73 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
2260 points/W
4792 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3268 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5485 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
958 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
10872 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4