| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100T vs Pentium G2020


Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the G2020 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the G2020 gets 31.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.6 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-S
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2015
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
25.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
42.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100T
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
3.14k
2.94k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
12.26k
8.23k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
3.69k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
2.46k (x1.11)
TOTAL
21.55k
17.33k (x0.8)

Multithread

i3-6100T

G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
6.52k
5.54k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
30.61k
15.47k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.59k
7.06k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.77k
2.99k (x1.08)
TOTAL
50.49k
31.05k (x0.62)

Performance/W
i3-6100T
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
186 points/W
101 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
875 points/W
281 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
302 points/W
128 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
1442 points/W
565 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
980 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3832 points/GHz
2839 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
690 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
TOTAL
6733 points/GHz
5976 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4