Core i3-6100T vs Core 2 Duo E6320
Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the E6320 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the E6320 gets 12 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 4.2 times faster than the E6320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 50.5 k points while the E6320 gets 12 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 4.2 times faster than the E6320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
6f6
Core
Skylake-S
Conroe
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.86 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
November 2015
April 2007
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
8.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
13.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100T
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
3.14k
1.86k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
12.26k
1.87k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
1.83k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
1.81k (x0.82)
TOTAL
21.55k
7.37k (x0.34)
Multithread
i3-6100T
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
6.52k
3.68k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
30.61k
3.69k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.59k
3.6k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.77k
1.06k (x0.38)
TOTAL
50.49k
12.03k (x0.24)
Performance/W
i3-6100T
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
186 points/W
57 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
875 points/W
57 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
302 points/W
55 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
1442 points/W
185 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
980 points/GHz
1003 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3832 points/GHz
1003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1231 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
690 points/GHz
975 points/GHz
TOTAL
6733 points/GHz
3964 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4