| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100T vs i5-9300H


Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the i5-9300H gets 244.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 2.3 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
906ea
Core
Skylake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FCBGA1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2015
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
67.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
244.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100T
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.14k
3.38k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
12.26k
12.84k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
4.6k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
6.23k (x2.82)
TOTAL
21.55k
27.05k (x1.26)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.52k
11.6k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
30.61k
48.01k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.59k
17.05k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.77k
3.88k (x1.4)
TOTAL
50.49k
80.54k (x1.6)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100T
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.58k
26.62k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
16.97k
23.38k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.91k
5.52k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
12.05k (x3.47)
TOTAL
43.92k
67.57k (x1.54)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.02k
107.95k (x2.3)
Test#2 (FP)
44.41k
104.02k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
24.4k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
7.74k (x2.01)
TOTAL
105.21k
244.1k (x2.32)

Performance/W
i3-6100T
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1344 points/W
2399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1269 points/W
2312 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284 points/W
542 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
3006 points/W
5424 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6119 points/GHz
6493 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5303 points/GHz
5703 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
1346 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
2938 points/GHz
TOTAL
13726 points/GHz
16480 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4