| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100T vs i5-4300U


Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-4300U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the i5-4300U gets 64.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.6 times faster than the i5-4300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
40651
Core
Skylake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1168
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2015
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
32.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
64.79k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100T
i5-4300U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.58k
16.54k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
16.97k
8.71k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.91k
3.69k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
3.24k (x0.93)
TOTAL
43.92k
32.18k (x0.73)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i5-4300U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.02k
31.64k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
44.41k
21.59k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
8.46k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
3.09k (x0.8)
TOTAL
105.21k
64.79k (x0.62)

Performance/W
i3-6100T
i5-4300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1344 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1269 points/W
1439 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284 points/W
564 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
206 points/W
TOTAL
3006 points/W
4319 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
i5-4300U
Test#1 (Integers)
6119 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5303 points/GHz
3003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
1116 points/GHz
TOTAL
13726 points/GHz
11097 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4