Core i3-6100T vs i5-3340M
Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 79.1 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 79.1 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.3 times faster than the i5-3340M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-S
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2015
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
31.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
62.75k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100T
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
10.46k
11.51k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.55k
11.13k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
4.4k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
4.55k (x1.48)
TOTAL
34.79k
31.58k (x0.91)
Multithread
i3-6100T
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
23.92k
22.59k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
42.11k
25.49k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
10.42k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
4.25k (x1.66)
TOTAL
79.1k
62.75k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i3-6100T
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
683 points/W
645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
728 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
300 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
73 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
2260 points/W
1793 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
3268 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5485 points/GHz
3273 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1295 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
958 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
TOTAL
10872 points/GHz
9288 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4