| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100T vs i5-2500K


Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-2500K is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 79.1 k points while the i5-2500K gets 111.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2500K is 1.4 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
206a7
Core
Skylake-S
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2015
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
32.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
111.83k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100T
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
10.46k
11.84k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
17.55k
10.43k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
5.22k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
5.36k (x1.75)
TOTAL
34.79k
32.85k (x0.94)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
23.92k
45.51k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
42.11k
40.83k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
20.7k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
4.79k (x1.87)
TOTAL
79.1k
111.83k (x1.41)

Performance/W
i3-6100T
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
683 points/W
479 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1203 points/W
430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
300 points/W
218 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
73 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
2260 points/W
1177 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
3268 points/GHz
3200 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5485 points/GHz
2818 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
958 points/GHz
1449 points/GHz
TOTAL
10872 points/GHz
8878 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4