| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100T vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
706e5
Core
Skylake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2015
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-6100T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.14k
4.05k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
12.26k
15.29k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.94k
9.04k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.21k
10.54k (x4.77)
TOTAL
21.55k
38.92k (x1.81)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.52k
9.05k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
30.61k
33.88k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.59k
15.34k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.77k
6.74k (x2.43)
TOTAL
50.49k
65.01k (x1.29)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.46k
13.9k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
17.55k
20.13k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
9.41k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
10.59k (x3.45)
TOTAL
34.79k
54.03k (x1.55)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
23.92k
55.4k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
42.11k
59.01k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
22.83k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
6.7k (x2.61)
TOTAL
79.1k
143.94k (x1.82)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
19.58k
25.53k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
16.97k
19.99k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.91k
9.31k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
10.81k (x3.12)
TOTAL
43.92k
65.64k (x1.49)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
47.02k
58.46k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
44.41k
57.31k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
20.1k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
6.81k (x1.77)
TOTAL
105.21k
142.69k (x1.36)

Performance/W
i3-6100T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1344 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1269 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
3006 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6119 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5303 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
13726 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4