| | | | | | |

Core i3-6100T vs i5-10300H


Description
The i3-6100T is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-6100T gets a score of 105.2 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 2.3 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
a0652
Core
Skylake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
43.92k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
105.21k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-6100T
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
10.46k
15.65k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
17.55k
23.13k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
5.66k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
11.43k (x3.73)
TOTAL
34.79k
55.87k (x1.61)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
23.92k
26.77k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
42.11k
43.81k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
10.17k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
11.91k (x4.64)
TOTAL
79.1k
92.66k (x1.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-6100T
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.58k
27.14k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
16.97k
24.75k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.91k
5.73k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
11.84k (x3.41)
TOTAL
43.92k
69.47k (x1.58)

Multithread

i3-6100T

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.02k
105.77k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
44.41k
107.47k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.93k
24.82k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.85k
8.02k (x2.08)
TOTAL
105.21k
246.07k (x2.34)

Performance/W
i3-6100T
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1344 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1269 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
284 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
3006 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-6100T
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6119 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5303 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1221 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
13726 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4